I'm sure that this has been covered elsewhere in the comments, but the identification of Crooks was a feat of magic in itself. FBI stated that he was not carrying any identification, so they had to resort to DNA matching to confirm who he was. They also stated that he has no prior arrest record--so how does a kid in a rural county in PA …
I'm sure that this has been covered elsewhere in the comments, but the identification of Crooks was a feat of magic in itself. FBI stated that he was not carrying any identification, so they had to resort to DNA matching to confirm who he was. They also stated that he has no prior arrest record--so how does a kid in a rural county in PA wind up in the feds' DNA database? Very very little about this makes sense, which means we're being lied to at every turn.
Yes but there are MANY ways to get DNA IN DATA BASE , Everyone who took a fake PCR test may have given them this , in many states cops have been doing random road blocks and taking DNA SAMPLES , and many medical procedures, and even given it to CCP/ CHINA as well
Fine, but let's not add to the "theories." Dear Feds: please tell us how Crooks's DNA wound up in your searchable database, and how long the matching process took. I am only concerned with evidence here, not with finding a way to conveniently explain something without facts supporting it.
They collected a sample from the sloped roof after the alleged shooter being shot, ran it down to the black SUVs that were running and standing by, put it on ice, sped to the nearest facility to run the super duper accurate analysis, which the results were compared to millions and millions of records, all under 2 hrs. What is the issue? Surely someone has video of this? Someone has video of Crooks shooting right?
A lot of people have done genetic searches on themselves with apps like 23 and me, Ancestry and so forth. If they checked his DNA and got anywhere close and paired that with his father reporting him missing with his AR15 then it gets a lot easier to narrow the possibilities.
I'm sure that this has been covered elsewhere in the comments, but the identification of Crooks was a feat of magic in itself. FBI stated that he was not carrying any identification, so they had to resort to DNA matching to confirm who he was. They also stated that he has no prior arrest record--so how does a kid in a rural county in PA wind up in the feds' DNA database? Very very little about this makes sense, which means we're being lied to at every turn.
Yes but there are MANY ways to get DNA IN DATA BASE , Everyone who took a fake PCR test may have given them this , in many states cops have been doing random road blocks and taking DNA SAMPLES , and many medical procedures, and even given it to CCP/ CHINA as well
Fine, but let's not add to the "theories." Dear Feds: please tell us how Crooks's DNA wound up in your searchable database, and how long the matching process took. I am only concerned with evidence here, not with finding a way to conveniently explain something without facts supporting it.
They collected a sample from the sloped roof after the alleged shooter being shot, ran it down to the black SUVs that were running and standing by, put it on ice, sped to the nearest facility to run the super duper accurate analysis, which the results were compared to millions and millions of records, all under 2 hrs. What is the issue? Surely someone has video of this? Someone has video of Crooks shooting right?
We will never get a factual or truthful answer how they got this match, Im just saying many have given this info whether they know this or not
A lot of people have done genetic searches on themselves with apps like 23 and me, Ancestry and so forth. If they checked his DNA and got anywhere close and paired that with his father reporting him missing with his AR15 then it gets a lot easier to narrow the possibilities.